The RADPAC model of conflict resolution is a framework that describes successful negotiation as a dialectical process, where each letter of the acronym relates to a distinct aspect of the negotiation. Negotiations often take place within the organization world but also outside. A negotiation is defined as an interaction between two or more people, with the intention of attaining a suitable outcome for a particular issue. It also involves an interactive dialogue in order to identify and clarify key issues and potential solutions.
In a RADPAC model, individuals are placed in a mediation setting and asked to participate in a one-on-one negotiation between themselves. Each individual begins by making a brief presentation about what they think is the problem at hand. The individual then uses this presentation to engage in a dialogue with their counterpart, going over all the key issues with which they disagree. The individual may then propose some sort of compromise, although it is extremely rare for them to actually carry out any of these proposals. If the other party's proposal is not acceptable, they are encouraged to make a counter proposal that is acceptable to both sides. The negotiation usually ends with a mutually agreed upon agreement to the terms specified in the proposal.
The process that occurs in a Rad PAC mediation allows individuals to learn how to use various tools and how to communicate effectively in order to reach a desirable result. It also gives you the ability to know when your counterpart has reached a predetermined agreement, and you then have the power to let him or her know that you agree with the results and are therefore agreeing to the terms proposed. You can let them know that you are open to considering suggestions made during the course of the session that may further refine the issues being discussed. By using the radar model, you will better understand how to deal with different types of arguments, and you will be able to increase your persuasive skills greatly.
The radpac model has been successfully used by organizations such as the United States Conference of Mayors, American Bar Association, and the National Association of Manufacturers in their negotiations with businesses and government entities regarding public policy issues. These organizations found that their negotiations were more successful when they used the radpac model compared to using back-room negotiations and even legal counsel. They found that their level of trust and comfort that their counterparts had with the process increased, which increased their ability to make reasonable decisions on their own. Individuals involved in any Rad PAC mediation must remember that the objective is for everyone to come out with a solution that is acceptable to all parties, and that includes the parties that would normally be negotiating in private.
One of the things that you will learn to use the radial model is how to develop effective communication strategies to get you the results that you want. Communication plays a very big role in any negotiations, and the radpac model teaches you how to use the best available tools including an agenda, notes and other tools to get you from point A to point B. Once you start communicating with the other side, it is very easy to get into a negotiation mode and begin arguing with them. It is important to remember during any Rad PAC mediation that everyone has their own ideas on what should be included in a settlement, and it is important to clearly separate your positions before going into closed-door meetings. If you are able to maintain an open line of communication during the mediation process, then you will have a better chance of reaching a fair agreement.
The radpac model also teaches individuals how to effectively negotiate about issues among themselves, which can often be a very difficult and tense situation to be in. There is always a possibility that one or more of the party may not be happy with the settlement that you have proposed, and this is where the role of a neutral third party will come in very handy. The one who is neutral is responsible for looking out for the best interests of all of the involved parties, and keeping in mind all of the different factors that will affect the outcome of any given negotiation.
There are different models of negotiation in an organisation and business environment you can check thekeepitsimple for elaborated explanations for the strategies and theories to read more blogs related to management.
댓글